The governments of Canada and British Columbia have a message for you: this is not a bailout.
Don't believe them.
In the spring of 2025, Prime Minister Mark Carney and Premier David Eby stood side by side to announce a $3.2 billion plan — the centerpiece of which is the purchase of more than 2,200 vacant, unsold condo units across Metro Vancouver. The federal government's Build Canada Homes agency and BC Housing will acquire these units from private developers and convert them into "affordable housing." The program is framed as a creative solution to a housing shortage.
But here's what it actually is: taxpayers bailing out developers who overbuilt, overpriced, and are now stuck holding inventory they can't sell.
The Numbers Tell the Story
Let's start with the scale of the problem. As of early 2025, there were approximately 4,376 completed condos sitting empty in Metro Vancouver — a staggering 76% increase from the year prior. One third of those units are priced above $1 million. The market has clearly spoken: buyers aren't buying at these prices.
So what do the developers do? They don't lower their prices. They go to government.
And the government comes running — to the tune of $3.2 billion in direct measures, plus a commitment of more than $5 billion from the federal government into BC's local infrastructure through the Build Communities Strong Fund over the next decade. Development charges on new multi-unit housing could be reduced by up to 50%, saving builders as much as $40,000 per unit — also funded by the public purse.
The specific per-unit purchase price the government will pay for those 2,200 condos? The federal housing ministry hasn't told us yet. They say they'll work it out "in the coming weeks." Details on what rents will be charged to tenants won't come until fall.
In other words: we're committing billions, but we'll tell you what we're spending later.
"Developers Don't Want to Sell at a Loss"
That line came directly from Prime Minister Carney at the announcement. Read it again.
Developers don't want to sell at a loss.
Since when does not wanting to take a loss entitle you to have the government buy you out at a price that protects your margins? That is not how a free market works. That is not how accountability works. And in any other industry, that is not how business works.
When a restaurant over-orders food and it goes bad, no one reimburses the chef. When a retailer over-stocks a product that doesn't sell, they markdown and move on. When developers in Metro Vancouver overbuild luxury condos during a market they misread, they get a call from the Prime Minister and a cheque from the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation.
The playing field has never been more uneven — and it's you, the ordinary BC taxpayer, renting or trying to buy a home at market prices, who is levelling it for them.
A Word for What This Really Is: Moral Hazard
Steve Eisman — the investor made famous in The Big Short for predicting the 2008 US housing collapse — had a memorable take on this plan. He called it "moral hazard on steroids," and said it was worse than the 2008 American subprime fiasco.
Why? Because when you socialize losses and privatize gains, you don't just solve the problem in front of you — you guarantee the next one. You send a message to every developer in the country: build aggressively, price ambitiously, and if the market doesn't cooperate, the government will be there to clean it up. Taxpayers will absorb the downside so you never have to.
That is what moral hazard means. And right now, BC and Ottawa are writing it into policy.
What About the "Affordable Housing" We're Getting in Return?
Supporters of the plan argue that at least we're getting something: 2,200 units of affordable housing in one of the most expensive cities in the world. That's not nothing.
But it's worth asking some hard questions:
Who defines "affordable"? The government hasn't released rent levels. Remember: a third of the vacant units cost over a million dollars to build. If the government is paying close to market value for those units (which, again, we don't know yet), achieving genuinely below-market rents means subsidizing every single tenant indefinitely. Forever.
What does this do to the rental market? Vancouver's rental market has actually been softening. The overall vacancy rate in Metro Vancouver rose to its highest level in over 30 years in 2025. Rents for condos and purpose-built rentals fell by 15.1% compared to 2023. November 2025 marked the 24th consecutive month of annual rent declines.
In a market that is already correcting — naturally, organically, through supply and demand — the government is stepping in to prevent the bottom from falling further. Not for renters. For developers.
What does this do to the condo market itself? Purchasing 2,200 of the roughly 4,376 vacant units removes nearly half of Metro Vancouver's unsold supply. That's not clearing a glut — that's propping up a price floor. It signals to the market that the government will intervene before prices are allowed to fall to where ordinary people can actually afford them.
The Local Government Problem
Here's something else: municipal governments aren't cheering either. The deal was negotiated between Victoria and Ottawa without meaningful consultation with the cities and municipalities who will actually be managing these converted buildings and the communities around them. Local governments have their own infrastructure pressures, and absorbing hundreds of subsidized rental units into neighbourhoods without coordination creates its own set of challenges.
It's a top-down fix to a problem that required bottom-up understanding.
Who's Paying for This?
You are. I am. Every working British Columbian filing a tax return is.
When the government purchases 2,200 condo units at or near market prices from developers who "don't want to sell at a loss," it is transferring wealth from the public to a private industry that made speculative bets and lost. It is locking in the developers' profit — or at least limiting their loss — while leaving the taxpayer holding an asset portfolio of overpriced condos with no disclosed management plan and no confirmed rent structure.
And then there's the broader $3.2 billion in infrastructure subsidies designed to reduce development costs by up to 50%. That's money that won't be going to schools, healthcare, roads, or any of the other things government is supposed to do.
My Take: No. This Is Not Right.
I work in real estate. I believe in the market. I believe in the importance of housing supply. And I believe that getting more rental units built and occupied in Metro Vancouver is genuinely important.
But I do not believe that the right way to achieve that goal is to protect developers from the consequences of their own decisions at the expense of ordinary taxpayers.
A fair market means bearing your own risk. If developers overbuilt and overpriced, the correct outcome is that they reduce their prices until the market clears — which, in turn, brings home prices down closer to what real people can actually pay. That is the correction British Columbians have been waiting years for.
Instead, we're getting a government intervention designed specifically to prevent that correction from happening — to "clear off the overhang," in the Prime Minister's own words, without allowing prices to fall.
That's not housing policy. That's a bailout.
Call it what it is.













